Like having a meticulous, experienced colleague read your entire application and give you constructive, criteria-based feedback — available on demand.
Grant Assistant reads, critiques, and comments on what you have written. Every word in your grant remains yours.
Fully aligned with NIH Policy NOT-OD-25-132 on responsible use of AI in grant applications.
Everything you need to see your application through a reviewer's eyes.
Each review factor — Significance, Approach, Innovation, Investigator — receives a 1–9 NIH-scale score with detailed commentary on strengths and weaknesses.
Download your .docx with inline Word comments placed at specific paragraphs. Filter by severity level (Hi/Med/Lo) and regenerate on the fly.
Downloadable DOCX summary report with scores, feedback, and timestamped footer. A structured overview of your application's strengths and gaps.
Revise your application and resubmit for another round of review whenever you're ready. No limits on how many times you iterate.
Select the review criteria appropriate for your grant mechanism — R01, K23, VA Merit, and more. Each mechanism evaluated against its specific criteria.
Toggle Hi/Med/Lo severity levels when downloading annotated documents. Focus on the most critical issues first, then address the rest.
Four steps from upload to a stronger application.
Upload your grant document in .docx format to a project
Choose your grant mechanism — R01, K23, VA Merit, and more
Get scored criteria, inline comments, strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions
Iterate as many times as you need until your application shines
Successful investigators routinely circulate drafts to colleagues, mentors, and mock study sections. But access to experienced reviewers is uneven — early-career researchers, those at smaller institutions, or investigators entering new fields may lack a deep bench of colleagues.
Grant Assistant provides the kind of rigorous, criteria-based feedback that a seasoned reviewer would offer, available on demand at any stage of the writing process.
Get experienced-reviewer-level feedback before you have an established network
Access the same caliber of feedback available at major research universities
Moving into a new field? Get feedback even without domain-specific colleagues
Your grant applications contain sensitive research. We treat them that way.
Explicit contractual commitment. Not a checkbox in settings — a legal guarantee.
Data processed transiently with 24-hour TTL. Not written to persistent storage on AI provider servers.
Governed by enterprise Terms of Service and Cloud Data Processing Addendum. No human review of your prompts.
Every word in your grant remains yours. Grant Assistant helps you see your application through a reviewer's eyes, catch issues you might have missed, and ultimately submit a stronger proposal.
The ideas, the science, and the writing are all yours — we just help you shine.
Also from OmniKog
Institutional research portfolio dashboard. Track faculty effort, monitor funding risk, and generate compliance reports — from a single department to an entire university.
Learn about RunwayWe're launching soon. Request a demo to see the kind of feedback that makes the difference between triage and discussion.
Request a Demo